Internal arithmetic and consistent totals
Per-symbol net P&L, all five column totals and the overall recalculation agree.
From fill records,
to a review you can verify.
A complete synthetic diagnostic example showing how inputs enter the calculation, which evidence limits the conclusions, and what to collect next.
This synthetic example illustrates the report structure. All values and inputs are synthetic; they are not customer results, real account performance or evidence of product operation. This is not a software runtime report or an external CSV template.
The HTML copy includes the full report. Keep report.css and the assets folder beside it to preserve its appearance. The JSON download is the same synthetic dataset, with English field keys and Chinese descriptive labels; it contains the amounts, checks and gaps shown here.
01
First, define what this report can establish.
- Subject
- A fill review structure for BTC and ETH, denominated in USDT
- Period and account
- A synthetic demonstration batch with no claimed real trading period and no real account association
- Accounting basis
- All amounts are in USDT; fees and funding are presented as costs
- Checkable scope
- Per-symbol calculations, consistent totals, cost deductions and separate presentation of execution deviation
- Conclusion limits
- Does not confirm real sources, account completeness, strategy ownership, validity or readiness to trade
A reviewable report also keeps unresolved questions visible.
This sample does not access market data, orders, accounts or software runtime results. PASS below describes only calculation relationships within the synthetic data.
Input types and availability
| Input type | Sample contents | Evidence limits |
|---|---|---|
| Order and fill summary | BTC / ETH gross P&L and symbol identifiers | Synthetic amounts with no real fill details |
| Fee summary | BTC 28; ETH 14 | Synthetic costs with no exchange fee records |
| Funding summary | BTC 12; ETH 6 | Synthetic costs with no real settlement records |
| Execution benchmark and deviation summary | BTC 5; ETH 2.5 | Synthetic deviation with no independent market benchmark |
| Source and ownership evidence | No independently verifiable source chain provided | REJECTED |
| Complete account history | No complete fill, settlement or cash-flow history provided | REJECTED |
| Strategy signals and version records | No signals, parameters or order links provided | REJECTED |
Why do summary amounts not establish that fills are real?
Amounts can satisfy a formula without establishing who produced the records, whether an export is complete, or whether fills belong to a specified strategy. A real diagnostic review also needs verifiable sources, order and fill IDs, fee records, a time window, and links from strategy signals to execution. This sample has none of that external evidence.
02
List every result, cost and deviation.
All amounts are synthetic and denominated in USDT. Net P&L deducts fees and funding; execution deviation is shown separately and is already included in P&L from the fills.
| Symbol | Gross P&L | Fees | Funding cost | Net P&L | Execution deviationShown separately · no further deduction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC | 90.00 | 28.00 | 12.00 | 50.00 | 5.00 |
| ETH | 30.00 | 14.00 | 6.00 | 10.00 | 2.50 |
| Total | 120.00 | 42.00 | 18.00 | 60.00 | 7.50 |
On small screens, scroll within the table. Positive P&L amounts illustrate the structure and do not represent customer results or strategy performance.
Gross P&L120USDT
Fees + Funding cost60USDT
Net P&L60USDT
Execution deviation · included in fill P&L7.5USDT
03
Trace every net result back to its formula.
Recalculation basis
Net P&L = Gross P&L − Fees − Funding cost
PASS · Internal arithmeticBTC
90 − 28 − 12 = 50USDT
PASSETH
30 − 14 − 6 = 10USDT
PASSTotal
120 − 42 − 18 = 60USDT
PASSView total and unit checks
- Gross P&L: 90 + 30 = 120 USDT.
- Fees: 28 + 14 = 42 USDT.
- Funding cost: 12 + 6 = 18 USDT.
- Net P&L: 50 + 10 = 60 USDT, consistent with the total recalculation.
- Execution deviation: 5 + 2.5 = 7.5 USDT, shown for diagnosis only.
This sample assumes that fees and funding are USDT costs, so no currency conversion or aggregation across currencies is needed. Real records still require verification of currencies, cost direction and exchange rates. This page does not present fee rates, returns or annualized results.
04
Show deviation without counting the cost twice.
Execution deviation is 5 USDT for BTC and 2.5 USDT for ETH, totaling 7.5 USDT. This is a synthetic summary of the difference between a benchmark and fills; the benchmark has not been independently verified.
Execution deviation is already included in fill P&L.
Do not deduct it again from net P&L.
Net P&L in this sample remains 60 USDT. Deducting the 7.5 USDT again and reporting 52.5 USDT would count the cost twice.
BTC · Shown separately5.00USDT
ETH · Shown separately2.50USDT
Total · Included in fill P&L7.50USDT
What evidence does a real execution deviation review need?
Define the comparison benchmark, record signal and order times, retain fill prices and quantities, and verify a consistent accounting basis. Deviation can help explain execution impact, but this page contains only synthetic summaries and no independently verifiable benchmark data. It therefore cannot establish real execution quality.
05
The arithmetic holds; the strategy conclusion remains rejected.
These statuses describe this synthetic sample. They do not certify STEDVOR software, verify a real account or authorize trading.
PASS
Execution deviation accounting
The 7.5 USDT is shown separately and is not deducted twice from net P&L.
Source and record authenticity
All inputs are synthetic summaries; no independent sources or real fill records are provided.
Complete account history coverage
Without complete fill, settlement, balance and cash-flow records, omissions and ownership cannot be established.
Links from strategy signals to fills
Without strategy versions, signals and order mappings, the amounts cannot be attributed to a specified strategy.
Sources not independently verified
Collect traceable original exports, account and order IDs, fill and fee records, and an execution benchmark. Synthetic summaries cannot replace these records.
Missing complete account history
Define the start and end of the review window. Check continuity across fills, funding, balances and cash flows, and identify omissions, duplicates and activity from other strategies.
Missing strategy signal evidence
Collect the strategy version, parameters and signal times, with order and fill links, before assessing strategy ownership, execution deviation or performance.
Why is the final conclusion REJECTED rather than PASS?
PASS covers only internal calculations on the supplied synthetic amounts. Sources, history and strategy signals are three required bodies of evidence that have not been independently verified. The strategy conclusion is therefore REJECTED: this sample cannot establish strategy validity. Additional records require a new review; providing them does not automatically produce PASS.
Bring your questions to a pilot review.
Explore the inputs, diagnostic review and evidence limits in the context of your research workflow.